Judith Eckle-Kohler

``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `richard.eckart` on 2014-07-19 12:25:20

``` >> Is there a technical reason that the two modules are separate? yes, see https://code.google.com/p/uby/issues/detail?id=43&can=1&q=test ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `eckle.kohler` on 2014-07-19 15:06:16

``` Might be resolvable by using a pre-generated embedded database instead of generating it on the fly. ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `richard.eckart` on 2014-07-19 17:43:22

what does "once more" refer to? any previous mailing list discussions about this topic?

there are many cases of discontinuous SemPreds (verb particle constructions, light verb constructions). It might be useful to have a Fragment feature where "type" information can be kept in order...

yes, it is not an example of a discontinuous SemArg (might be annotated as one in IGGSA though ...)

thanks for posting the examples. IMO, using SemPred and SemArg for the subjective expressions (as defined in IGGSA -- I had a look at the guidelines https://sites.google.com/site/iggsasharedtask/task-1/STEPS_guide.pdf?attredirects=0 ) is a...