Judith Eckle-Kohler
Judith Eckle-Kohler
``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `eckle.kohler` on 2014-10-30 16:14:20 - **Labels added**: Milestone-0.7.0 - **Labels removed**: Milestone-0.6.0
``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `chmeyer.de` on 2015-04-10 08:57:50 - **Labels added**: Milestone-0.8.0 - **Labels removed**: Milestone-0.7.0
``` what is the difference between Convenience methods and Smart API methods? I agree that we should offer either of these. in the meantime: educate the users ``` Original issue...
``` Valid question :) Here's what I had in mind: * Convenience method: a method wrapping the access to a Synset's synonyms given a sense (excluding the identity) - such...
``` Same issue appears with definitions of sense and synset. In WordNet, the sense's definition is null, in Wiktionary the synset's. We already have a convenience method getDefinitionText() which could...
``` Having thought about it, I dislike (semi-)intelligent or smart methods for various reasons. If we decide to offer those methods, they should always issue a warning such as: Calling...
``` decision: we will implement convenience methods, such as - get senses of synonyms (using Synset) - get word forms of synonyms (using SenseRelation and Synset) - get senses of...
``` getSynonymousSenses(Synset) getSynonymousSenses(Lemma) getSynonymousLemma(Synset, SenseRelation) - not sure here... is the sense relation actually an input or something followed internally? ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `richard.eckart` on 2014-08-01...
``` After thinking about our discussion, I think that what I called Smart API methods is not even feasible b/c of the different types that the two sources for synonyms...
``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `eckle.kohler` on 2014-10-09 17:26:40