JT Thielen

No, I haven't yet, but I'll plan on doing that soon. I'm also going to test the constants against those in MetPy, and try to see if any floating point...

Here are the results in testing it against the thermo tests: https://gist.github.com/jthielen/9db772f0681bfee95b473a163669ca23 In short, there are many failed tests due to changes in results, and unfortunately the results are rather...

My instinct would be skipping grid/projection handling for this case rather than adding a possibly fictitious (since there isn't really a datum or projection to be referred to?) identity transformation,...

I think this may be a typo/copy-paste error! Note that in your initial example code, you used an invalid key `longitude_of_projection_origin` rather than `longitude_of_central_meridian` ([as used in the CF conventions...

Would the projected geospatial coordinate functionality of [xwrf](https://xwrf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) meet your needs instead?

The changes here look good to me, and as far as I'm aware, that's the same list of functions that I'm aware of that'd be covered by NEP 35. So...

@hgrecco That sounds great! I'll be sure to experiment some more with what can be done now, and will follow the upstream issues with great interest.

As far as the units of uncertain translation go: - `savedtke12d` with `W/m.K`: given how it is used in https://github.com/wrf-model/WRF/blob/master/Registry/registry.lake, I'd say match the thermal conductivity values elsewhere in the...

Thanks for the ping on this, and sorry for the very long delay! Unfortunately I'm a bit swamped with prelim-related stuff at the moment, so I won't be able to...

> Hey @jthielen, I'm just going to go ahead and merge this if you don't mind. Yes, please go ahead! Sorry for my continued inattentiveness. Hopefully things will be getting...