Johannes Meixner
Johannes Meixner
@gdha yes, of course it is OK
This one cannot be done for ReaR 3.0 but - hopefully - it could be done for ReaR 3.1. But what I really would like to get done for ReaR...
@saschalucas you need at least debug mode '-d' preferably full debugscript mode '-D' to be able to see what went wrong. In general: Caution with possible secrets in a debug...
@saschalucas because you use `OUTPUT=PORTABLE`: What rescue system do you use? I ask because ``` In portable mode ReaR assumes that all required software is available in the rescue system....
I think this issue can be closed because it is fixed via https://github.com/rear/rear/pull/2907
According to what ``` # git log -p --follow doc/rear-release-notes.txt ``` shows this special license for this particular file was already there when this file was introduced via https://github.com/rear/rear/commit/b91baf682fd9f4e1b72884f574a8a726a86300fd But...
What git shows as authors of rear-release-notes.txt ``` # git log -p --follow doc/rear-release-notes.txt | grep '^Author: ' | sort -u Author: Dag Wieers Author: Dag Wieërs Author: Damani Author:...
Because in general ReaR is under GPL v3 license I suggest to also have rear-release-notes.txt under GPL v3. Hereby I (as one of the by git listed authors) I agree...
@lzaoral did Fedora's major check of licenses perhaps find also other files in ReaR that are not under GPL v3 but have a different license explicitly specified? If yes, could...
I think we should do the license change for ReaR 3.0 if possible.