Jon Skeet
Jon Skeet
(I filed the issue as if I got confused by the lack of 1.0.0 on the web site, others might too.)
Point taken about the BREAKING CHANGE - my mistake, sorry about that. In terms of making breaking changes - it would be a matter of "All existing tools support Conventional...
I suspect that no-one's convincing anyone to change their mind about whether this is worth doing or not, so I'm going to bow out of the conversation at this point....
Hmm.... will have to look into it in more detail. I'm not even sure whether we need to explicitly say anything here, or whether it just drops out. Fundamentally I...
> I'm leaning towards just keeping things as they are today. Meaning, we can do minor versions (with new optional attributes) but the version string on the wire doesn't change....
> Yup and I think I'm less nervous about it than you because to me that's the nature of extensions - no matter what you do you're at risk. I...
I think we should be able to drop comment nodes: ```xml 012345 ``` should be fine and just assign an ID of "012345" for example. Comments are not part of...
> I don't believe this affects the actual wire-format in any way .. Well, it affects how we describe the expectation of what can be encoded "simply" in the XML...
@duglin: Happy to - it may not be in time for consideration at today's meeting though.
In what way are extensions "non-CE" data? I'm confused about the question. Happy to answer it when I understand it :)