Jim Huang

I really look forward to the support for static storage. However, is it enough to avoid the potential conflict with the name scheme `_`? That is, we might have `main_i`...

> On the other hand, in C, this is legal: > ```c > void foo() { static int i; { int i; /* ... */ } } > ``` >...

> id->class is 0 for passed parameters vs. class 'Par' or 'Loc'. There may be other inconsistencies for other storage types. Can you make a list of proposed changes to...

AST support was merged, and how can we proceed this task?

Let's revise the subject of this issue.

@ajblane : Do you have further modifications?

@koukaipan, Got it. Look forward to further participation.

@elfring, can you show me some detailed modifications over the existing implementation?

Is it something like JNI?

Thank @pakls for pointing ISA designs. Frankly speaking, I have no preference about ISA since everything just started as a "toy".