Julien Schueller
Julien Schueller
the thing is I dont get any difference between the serial and omp code here on linux (gcc 12.2) what would explain this diffs on cygwin or freebsd you guys...
maybe the issue should be reopened ?
I'd be happy to test, at least on linux.
ok on linux for both 1 & 2, @yurivict can you tests this on freebsd ?
sounds cool, maybe rebase to current master so it could pass the tests
Funny I had this discussion recently. The callback to interface the objective function operates on one point at a time for now, but maybe a new callback that operates on...
1. this would not be the responsibility of nlopt, this can already be done on the user side to 2. The way I see it Nlopt cannot be responsible of...
2. I'm not saying that parallelization is not possible. I'm just saying NLopt cannot assume thread-safety of the function, that's why I think this should be delegated to the user...
@scottfharvey-cm I think no one is working on it, else I think pagmo does parallel optimization.