Joshua O'Madadhain
Joshua O'Madadhain
Oh, and a brief placeholder thought for later: I'm not sure that there's much value in a Network variant of a Tree. If one wants an object associated with each...
Another issue we're going to need to address here : make sure that the Tree classes are tested as well as the Guava common.graph classes (and not just indirectly via...
@jbduncan The licensing requirements of Apache 2.0 and the 3-clause BSD license (which JUNG uses) are compatible, as I understand it, so I don't think that taking inspiration from Guava's...
I apparently missed the above comment. What I meant by "they" was the common.graph unit tests. I mean, they're not terrible, but I remember a discussion from a few years...
Not sure why GitHub thinks this issue should have been closed, there are still unresolved issues here, such as: (1) what tree-related classes do we need to hang onto (2)...
I agree that several of these are on point and uncontroversial: * consistent bracing * use of Preconditions * use of Immutable classes and final modifiers where appropriate I don't...
Yeah, we can universally use `camelCase` in that instance, that ship has sailed. :) The parameter/return types thing essentially breaks down into two elements: * In some cases we need...
@jbduncan, please make sure that you update this issue as you check off items on the list.
FYI, I'm working on converting common.base.Function to java.util.Function.
Conversion from Guava functional interfaces to use the java.util.function.{Predicate, Function, Supplier} interfaces instead is now complete.