Jonathan Kimmitt

The build failed, but a necessary step: 'make db-prepare-kintex7' does not seem to be included in the regression flow. As far as I can see this needs to run before...

This is what I get running locally: ``` jrrk@jonathan-NUC10i7FNK:~/prjxray$ make db-prepare-kintex7 Preparing kintex7 files ============================ Part xc7k160tfbg484-1 has an unsupported device xc7k160t Part xc7k160tfbg484-2 has an unsupported device xc7k160t Part...

Perhaps we need two X-Ray databases, one that can be generated from WebPack, another (for larger parts) that has to be generated by owners of suitable boards (that come with...

I committed my new database here (https://github.com/jrrk2/prjxray-db/tree/k325). I suppose that means that eventually anybody can use this part license-free. GitHubGitHub - jrrk2/prjxray-db at k325Project X-Ray Database: XC7 Series. Contribute to...

Furthermore the 7k325t part is used in the frequently encountered KC705 board from Xilinx and the Genesys2 board from Diligent. The latter comes with a Vivado node/device-locked license which may...

Thanks for the heads-up but this will not take us much further forward unless support is added for kintex7 in the symbiflow-arch-defs repo. I'm not familiar with CMake config files...

> Kintex 7 failed really fast. First `make --dry-run` and `source settings/kintex7.sh && make -C fuzzers` ran without actually running any fuzzers, then `source settings/kintex7_325t.sh && make -C fuzzers part_only`...

I spoke too soon, XRAY_ROI_TILEGRID is commented out which I took to mean (based on the comment above) that the whole device would be considered. Mea culpa.

It seems to me the automated process preferably should be modified to include utils/prjxray_form_channels.py and friends, this is also a lengthy process which takes a number of hours per part....

I haven’t tried to build the xc7k70 support and I’m not aware of any cost-effective boards that use it. My recollection is that the xc7k325 support peaks at around 250GB...