Jonathan Pober
Jonathan Pober
We've got a project that is hitting a bottleneck due to the lack of select on read for MWA correlator fits files. We should discuss the feasibility of implementing it...
Many of the options in read_mwa_corrfits don't tell you what the defaults are in the docstrings. That would be helpful info to add.
We could do more thinking about how to pedagogically present our tutorial material (e.g. file format conversion probably shouldn't be the first thing). We could consider waiting until v3 and...
Line 885 of simsetup.py says the supported filetypes are: One of ['skyh5', 'gleam', 'vot', 'text', 'hdf5'] or None. But it seems this function calls pyradiosky's read, which lists the supported...
The READMEs for the reference simulations list the expected files as .uvfits. We changed the default output to .uvh5, so we should update those docs.
In 2.3_airy_flat_PS: ~Two of magnitude of difference in visibility amplitudes. (New runs are smaller.) Phases are different too; visibilities are not scaled copies of each other. Change seems to appear...
Our reference sims currently use the Fagnoni UVBeam as our example of a UVBeam. We should probably switch to something non-proprietary... do we have another UVBeam that makes sense to...
Changes are very small. Replace with a stable version generated sim. See: https://www.overleaf.com/9613713963jthpjznmmyvx
New versions of reference sim 1.2_zenith (regardless of beam) do not match the old ones (regardless of which Google Drive link). There are two source catalogs that could be used...
A change to pyuvsim (likely to allow non-rectangular nblts, i.e., nblts =!= nbls*ntimes) changed the ordering of visibilities. Therefore, our equality checks with older reference sims fail even when the...