Julius Pfrommer
Julius Pfrommer
> It seems, that the new permission checks are now hard-wired into several places instead of being encapsulated in the AccessControl plugin. Is this desired? We will have both. You...
I don't have the Simulation Server installed atm. Can you provide a log output (with an increased log fidelity) or even a Wireshark dump?
- [ ] Change `void * UA_Array_new(size_t size, const UA_DataType *type)` to ``` c UA_StatusCode UA_Array_new(void **outArray, size_t *outSize, UA_Int32 requestedSize, const UA_DataType *type) ``` That lets us handle edge...
- [ ] The Server_addXXXNode function can be simplified/improved. For example, addObjectTypeNode might take a `subTypeOf` argument instead of parent and parentReference.
- [ ] Add a server-wide node creation callback (suggested in https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/open62541/wugJCNEu_n8)
- [ ] Add more limits to the server, e.g. maxsubscriptions, a.s.o.
- [x] Forward the session handle (userdata) with the method callback.
Ouch. We have to fix that. Looking at the code snippet, you are on v1.0.1 and not v1.1 (current master). Please confirm. Do you have encryption enabled?
Good idea! But let’s rather do that on master. And split commits across subsystems Merging such a big change would be a pain.
I just added a test to verify chunking on v1.0.1. See #3515. It appears to be fine for arrays of integer type. Can you make a source dump available on...