Josh Morony

> @joshuamorony thanks for the review! I'll update the doc tomorrow with the suggested changes. > > How do you feel about the code sample at the start and any...

Also probably a good time to bring up the `Analog SFC` naming which is what is being used now (by the Analog team as well), but imo I don't think...

Without any respect to the feasibility of the approaches (I have seen the current limitations in the related issue), the "ideal" way that I would want for trackBy to work...

I think what is likely happening here is that `content` is optional on the type, but in the `analog-markdown` component the fallback behaviour for `content` being undefined is to use...