Josh Johanning

Totally on the same page here! > Overall, I am good with this, but it is going to be "another API call", and I am cautious about adding more API...

3.5.2 didn't work for me (Apple M1, macOS 12.1)

@febuiles I believe the API supports it now? https://github.blog/changelog/2022-06-23-dependabot-alerts-filter-alerts-by-the-scope-of-the-dependency-runtime-and-development/ Will this be brought as an option to the action?

@saliceti @CWSites try `${{ github.head_ref }}` I used the github-script action though: ```yml - name: Trigger Workflow uses: actions/github-script@v6 with: script: | github.rest.actions.createWorkflowDispatch({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, workflow_id: 'new-workflow.yml', ref:...

So the equivalent with this action ```yml - name: Invoke workflow with inputs uses: benc-uk/workflow-dispatch@v1 with: workflow: new-workflow token: ${{ github.token }} inputs: '{ "exit-code": "1" }' ref: ${{ github.head_ref...

> @im-coder-lg: Quick question: Can you use this for Jekyll themes? I'm using the [chirpy](https://github.com/cotes2020/jekyll-theme-chirpy) jekyll theme on my GitHub pages-hosted blog. This is what I have at the moment...

I'll take a look! 👀

> I think this issue is closed, right? I thought Action are being enabled with the script in it's current state. > I am thinking about getting this merged based...

I changed this to be less prescriptive (ie: automatically enable actions if code scanning is enabled) and instead broke it out to a separate switch. Is this more preferred? What...

@NickLiffen great, anything else we want to check/test/verify/review before merging (I think the button is on you 😄 ⏯️ )