Josh Bruce
Josh Bruce
@shawnbot, @msecret - This feels like XHTML days a bit; extending the HTML specification via XML. For styling purposes, I remember browsers being able to handle this pretty well. For...
@shawnbot - How do native HTML+user-agent components fall into this construct? Specifically with the idea of progressive enhancement. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/details - accordion capabilities, for example.
@shawnbot - This code fascinates me a bit...probably a bit too much, to be honest. :) I'm not a JS guru (I know enough to be dangerous); so, pardon ignorance...
Sorry. Playing with tags.
@Feder1co5oave: Thinking labels for lexer, parser (already have), and whatever else might be beneficial as well. Thoughts??
Fair enough. Let's see how it goes then. :)
Having `pedantic` and `gfm` as flags still runs into the same issue of cross-flagging and could add some bloat to the code to account for it. Maybe: ```js { flavor:...
Believe this is related to new lines and possible regex - believe you would see the same behavior from the original Daring Fireball implementation as well. Can you try the...
This is the "proper" way to write Markdown, according to the original definition - this differentiates between block-level elements of different types. https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/basics Having said that, it looks like the...
Pedantic = Original Daring Fireball spec. So, probably should use the blank lines. Otherwise, we’ve marked it for consideration and further discussion.