jonathanmetzman
jonathanmetzman
> Will this include some way to permanently persist any failing test inputs? Not sure I understand, but I think yes, this is how oss-fuzz works. Project maintainers are notified...
> That's great - so it's not automatic, but there's zero chance a failed input will be lost, for example by rerunning a test? I don't know what you mean...
> Latest commit adds a `--type-check` argument to `butler.py lint` that controls whether to run the type checker or not, it defaults to false. I can switch it back to...
Thanks a ton for doing this!
> Ping? Any update 6 months later? The previous message is still present in the coverage builds, but I do not see what is the its cause. We generally don't...
Should be fixed in a day or so. On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 6:14 PM DavidKorczynski ***@***.***> wrote: > @jonathanmetzman did you have a > chance to look at...
I'm not sure it is a good idea. We never update the base-builder for ARM so encouraging people to use it will probably encourage using a footgun. I think I'd...
/gcbrun run_experiment.py -a --experiment-config /opt/fuzzbench/service/experiment-config.yaml --experiment-name 2023-12-09-standard-cov --fuzzers afl aflfast aflplusplus aflsmart centipede eclipser fairfuzz honggfuzz libafl libfuzzer mopt