Jonas Lagoni

Is there any of you who wants to champion this? 🙂 Or can we consider this issue as needs champion? 🤔

Is there any of you who wants to champion this? 🙂 Or can we consider this issue as needs champion? 🤔

@zamazan4ik you might want to take a look at https://github.com/asyncapi/spec/issues/622. I think that will enable your use-case. For all schemas, protobuf, Flatbuffers, whatever you need.

Issue moved to [asyncapi/modelina #812](https://github.com/asyncapi/modelina/issues/812) via [**ZenHub**](https://www.zenhub.com/)

Can you close down this issue @micro-jumbo, its not related to the spec 🙂

> We can use for that [standalone compilation](https://ajv.js.org/standalone.html) to generate validation function for our schema to improve performance. At the moment we "compile" (including dereferencing) schema in each execution of...

I think it makes sense to move this to https://github.com/asyncapi/spec-json-schemas, right?

Is anything stopping us from merging this? 🤔

I agree with @derberg, like the idea of keeping the AsyncAPI file as simple as possible (default over mandatory) 👍

Is there any of you who wants to champion this? 🙂 Or can we consider this issue as `needs champion`? 🤔