joldf

Sorry about the trouble to get this working, especially the lack of a link in the pull request text to the example script you found referenced from #344 – I...

It's a pity this didn't quite make it to production, especially since it seems like it's mainly because FreeBSD is hard (which is very worthwhile but not the most common...

🎉

For comparison, `.. automodule::` in `sphinx.ext.autodoc` will *always* print the package name (which is analogous to the C++ namespace). That's true even if `.. currentmodule::` is set: .. currentmodule:: ns...

@fowles The CLA is a strict legal requirement for pull requests, I understand that. That's why I didn't open a pull request. But I thought it was not a requirement...

@thisisnotapril Thanks for that explanation April. I think the confusion here is that I'm not actually trying to submit a contribution. I'm asking for some documentation to be changed but...

@fowles Would you be kind enough to make this change? I realise it doesn't impact most customers of protobuf but it would be really helpful for us.

@fowles Apologies for chasing but would you be able to make this change or find someone that could? I only expect it would take a few moments and would really...

Sorry for the noise but I've just seen that 1179 an 1180 are already used (they're just not at the end of the file) so it would need to be...

Following on from my last comment: it appears others have had the same confusion as me because 1179 and 1180 are both now duplicated allocations (see the [current `options.md`](https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/v23.1/docs/options.md)): 1179...