John Spackman

Yes, I believe that you're right - I've not tried it yet because this project also controls the lifecycle of tabs, which is useful to avoid resource leaks in long...

Hi Vlad, Great, I'm really glad you're interested! I've pushed a few fixes since my first post so it's a bit more battle tested now too 😄 We looked at...

@buremba thanks, it looks interesting - is it possible to use jsonnet API to edit the jsonnet code? I don't mean rewriting the JSON, I want to edit it in...

@buremba that's not quite what I meant - can I use an API to *edit the original* `myfile.jsonnet`, make changes programatically, and then write them back to `myfile.jsonnet` but preserving...

i get that, but that is not the purpose of my fork and "editable json". The purpose is that it is easy for a human to edit a json source...

i dont think we should deprecate qx.Promise - it adds a load of features that are useful (eg static methods such as `.all` etc as well as member methods) and...

There is already a mechanism to make environment settings declarative rather than a call in `defer` - `qx.Class.define` *already* supports an `environment` key, so there is no backwards compatibility issue,...

Sounds reasonable to me

I've been thinking along similar lines recently - doesn't this sound a lot like client-server communication? You could view it that the transport is a postmessage-based protocol as opposed to...

are/were you panyasan? If you can de/serialise an object into a a neutral form (eg JSON) then it can be transmitted; and by monitoring events it could be incrementally serialised...