johngt

Results 40 comments of johngt

Given that it will not be tested in SiVal could you please mark si_stage to NA. Thanks @vogelpi

@alees24 - please see the comment from @jettr and comment on whether there is a workaround procedure documented. If there is no work-around then we would need to get this...

@andreaskurth - when you get back could you sync with @rswarbrick and see what remains. If it can be done in the scope of M5 then that's good - otherwise...

@moidx / @cfrantz - I think the priority should be bumped up for this. Please correct me if I'm wrong. @luismarques - for visibility also as this will probably need...

Based on the approval of the TC this effort is deferred to at least M6. Making the Milestone change now. @moidx / @vogelpi / @andreaskurth

Based on the approval of the TC this effort is deferred to at least M6. Making the Milestone change now. @moidx / @vogelpi / @andreaskurth

Based on the approval of the TC this effort is deferred to at least M6. Making the Milestone change now. @moidx / @vogelpi / @andreaskurth

@andreaskurth / @alees24 - has this been completed? It seems to be something we should do as a clean-up. Makes less sense to push this any further as it otherwise...

Based on the approval of the TC this effort is deferred to at least M6. Making the Milestone change now. @moidx / @vogelpi / @andreaskurth