John Schnake

I agree on the surface that looks like a bug but may have been intentional due to some legacy support. Added tags to issue but still in need of someone...

Related https://github.com/spf13/cobra/issues/1272

It was just never got much traction, but the basic idea is straightforward: > If we used spaces to separate commands from subcommands and wanted this topic-level command to accept...

The question to answer before this can be implemented is where to add the configuration. Since the deprecation of different flags/options occurs at different times, I think it makes sense...

I'm not sure I fully understand the problem, can you clarify a few things? > i have a template to be executed Is this a template that cobra-cli is consuming...

That's clearly doable; all you're suggesting is to add another `mode` option so we'd have `quick, conformance, certified-conformance, expanded-conformance` That bit of coverage is more important to you working in...

xref #1560 , just starts from the understanding that it will be a new `--mode`

@jayunit100 I have the `sonobuoy modes` command all set. If you can give me an exact E2E_FOCUS, E2E_SKIP and whether or not they can be run in parallel or not...

Going to get a rough PR for this up so that after just a tad of feedback it is ready for merging. Expect that tonight or tomorrow.

Each of the pvc functionality tests is specific to a specific driver which would be very cluster specific. Thats just based on my brief look at it; is there some...