joerg1985
joerg1985
As diemol wrote: I remember now. We need to write a blog post about it, announce it, and then make the change because we cannot just deprecate the interface or...
I am happy with pushing it to Selenium 5, i was only asking because the issue had no target milestone at all. So i will add it to the Selenium...
Sorry @diemol i missed your comment
[🐛 Bug]: java.io.UncheckedIOException: java.io.IOException: HTTP/1.1 header parser received no bytes
@littlegeek01 did you try to set the `protocol-version` inside the relay config (available since v4.20.0)? @mykola-mokhnach why not dropping the http/2 headers in the appium server like the selenium server...
[🐛 Bug]: java.io.UncheckedIOException: java.io.IOException: HTTP/1.1 header parser received no bytes
@littlegeek01 there should be no direct traffic from the HUB to Appium, everything should passed through the relay. As long as the direct connect feature is not used, are you...
[🐛 Bug]: java.io.UncheckedIOException: java.io.IOException: HTTP/1.1 header parser received no bytes
@littlegeek01 The `/status` endpoint is handled by the appium server and not passed to the mobile device. So the connection from Appium to the mobile device might fail.
[🐛 Bug]: java.io.UncheckedIOException: java.io.IOException: HTTP/1.1 header parser received no bytes
@littlegeek01 the ReverseProxyHandler used by the relay to handle these requests (from the hub to the relay) will remove these headers so they should not be proxied to the appium...
This is a typical chromedriver message, e.g. https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromedriver/issues/detail?id=4474&can=2&q=no%20such%20execution%20context or https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromedriver/issues/detail?id=4687&can=2&q=no%20such%20execution%20context So i would expect this to happen without the grid and there is not mutch to do than report an...
Here are some infos, from my fedora 39 system, the used repo config and the offered packages: [joerg@mybox ~]$ uname -a Linux mybox 6.5.10-300.fc39.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Nov 2...
@vbatts sorry for bugging you, but the bazel 6 builds are still failing. Cloud you please check this? https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vbatts/bazel/package/bazel6/