Jodi Williamschen

This is an interesting request, but I'd like to see some MARC examples which illustrate this configuration. Do any exist?

**Add relation, Relation, relationship, and Relationship to the BF vocabulary** This Github issue introduces a way to express relationships between resources indirectly. The labels and definitions that were originally modelled...

Thanks for the feedback. The question about the examples led to a review of the marc2bibframe conversion, and a future update will include these changes: 1 - field 350 will...

FAST URIs are created now: https://id.loc.gov/tools/bibframe/compare-lccn/full-rdf?find=2021285925 Ducks Ducks

Conversion of $1 for authorized access points is part of marc2bibframe v2.6

Conversion of 046 $m and $n was included in marc2bibframe v2.5 Still working an option for 046 $o and $p

This was addressed in https://github.com/lcnetdev/bibframe-ontology/issues/44 "All members of the [Identifier Sources scheme](https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/identifiers) are now of type bf:Identifier to make clear their usability in Bibframe."

@kirkhess -- we took a different approach to creating a primary publication activity last year. The publication data from the 008 field is assigned to the existing bf:Place, etc. but...

@sfolsom -- using bf:collectionArrangement and bf:CollectionArrangement instead of bf:arrangment/Arrangement, does the definition still need to be refined?

@MiklosHubay -- do have a real-world example that we can review?