jmcclena

Sorry, my description of the problem was wrong. It is not an indexing thing. Its just that the initial value is chosen defaulting to 5.1e-5 for cumul_integrate. For my purposes,...

Fixing the omas print on https://github.com/gafusion/omas/blob/c3b538b04b22bff901cf61ba8d0bb76a38528c2a/omas/omas_machine.py#L219C1-L219C87 leads to new errors. I don't think returning the ods is sufficient

sigma_B0 exists in Sauter's paper (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465512002962). So I'd be surprised if one can be removed.

I'm not sure why `ec_launchers` would print that specific error, but 163303 doesn't have any ec. EC launchers looks fine on other EC shots like 155542

@orso82 That's what I was thinking at first too. But it was a bit easier for MSE, as each row had a different cocos. So we were able to set...

@torrinba The logic for handling the array can be found here: https://github.com/gafusion/omas/blob/4ab29a3ffd8621a74699c3e8197c2b01f506f318/omas/omas_core.py#L1342 Perhaps we can add logic to split by `*`, and perform all transforms in the split for em_coupling?

Something like 1354 turns to: ``` norm = 1 for transform in transform.split('*'): norm *= omas_physics.cocos_transform(self.cocosio, self.cocos)[transform] ```