Joel Lüthi

@will-moore Thanks for linking me to the user stories. I will be joining the community calls. Was mostly drawn by the tables discussion, but now I'm also looking forward to...

Hmm, I'm just preparing some example datasets with labels for a whole plate. In a first test for a plate that had labels for 6 wells (and each well consisting...

I have now created a larger plate with complete labels and tested it there. For a plate with 23 wells à 19440 x 20480 pixels (combined 8x9 field of views...

> I tried to reproduce that with your data and $ napari 2_acquisitions.ome.zarr/B/03/0/ but I only see the 3 image layers and 1 label layer, which is what I'd expect....

> But in your case, if seems that you really have multi-channel images where the channels just happen to be acquired at different rounds of imaging. It probably makes more...

Thanks for the comments and additional usage example of acquisitions @sbesson ! > The biggest worry is to converge towards a single viewer implementation allowing to resolve all the scenarios...

Thanks a lot for this context & for taking the time @sbesson ! I do believe there are a few different questions here. I tried to summarize them here, as...

🤯🤯🤯 Wow! I guess that should teach me about making any assumptions on the type of microscopy acquisitions people perform. Thanks for citing the actual details of this, would not...

Thanks a lot for the discussion! In that case, I'll start looking into creating an implementation (draft) for how this scenario could be loaded best. Will keep these ideas about...

I'm also very interested in this (and working with @tcompa & @mfranzon on this). If there are ways to display multiple sites, will there also be ways to determine the...