jlpoltrack

Just a quick note, I've ordered two eByte modules with LLCC68: 1. E220-400M30S 2. E220-900M30S I looked through the datasheet and I think they should be a drop-in replacement to...

FYI, ELRS team found worse performance on SX126x and LLCC68 compared to SX1276 - thread here: https://forum.lora-developers.semtech.com/t/llcc68-poor-sensitivity/1480/14

Quick notes on E220-900M30S module progress: - Seems to use regular crystal instead of TCXO, added #define SX_USE_CRYSTALOSCILLATOR to Hal - Can enter bind mode as an Rx but can't...

@olliw42 I think it's okay to close this. Was able to get E220 w/ LLCC68 working using the SX126x driver without any changes.

> > @olliw42 I think it's okay to close this. Was able to get E220 w/ LLCC68 working using the SX126x driver without any changes. > > Does this mean...

FLRC stress test (2x recommended stream rates): 

Docs branch: https://github.com/olliw42/mLRS-docu/tree/esp32-true-diversity

Tested on bench with latest commit on Matek ELRS-D and BetaFPV Super - looks good.

On my ESP-Now setup I run 80 MHz no problem - I can run some high speed captures if there's interest. Here's some numbers pulled from Espressif forum. Looks like...

@olliw42 @JyeSmith Just a few notes to keep the conversation going, please correct any misunderstandings. - mLRS uplink packet (ground to vehicle) contains both rc and serial data. There are...