Johnnie Birch

This patch is a replacement for #3740 Results currently look like this: https://github.com/jlb6740/wasmtime/pull/3#issuecomment-1179394254

> This is looking quite nice! Would it be possible to add `bytecodealliance/wasmtime-sightglass-benchmarking/.github/workflows/main.yml` to this repository as well? I think it'd be ideal if we could have everything in this...

@fitzgen @cfallin Hi guys .. had a good chat with @alexcrichton today and flushed out some concerns about the refactoring suggestion made. Its good to try the refactoring now. Since...

@alexcrichton Note, this latest patch is intended to address previous comments.

> Looks great to me, thanks again for your patience! > > I've got some minor nits below but it's fine to defer any or all of them to later...

Example output is here: https://github.com/jlb6740/wasmtime/pull/10 Note, the comment trigger /bench_x64 needs to be posted via the "review" comment box. It is not triggered by simply leaving a comment here in...

Thanks @abrown. @abrown @cfallin for the record, I'd like to get started with something simple. I'd like to claim fabs and fneg.

@abrown Thanks. I've actually used debugging support before based on a gist from @yurydelendik (https://gist.github.com/yurydelendik/4103d782dfc62634bc9f4de98de20835). How does this PR relate to that existing support which allowed breaking and stepping in...

Hi @PiotrSikora .. Thanks for the response. So I've updated the BUILD file for the example like this: > proxy_wasm_cc_binary( > name = "http_wasm_example.wasm", > srcs = ["http_wasm_example.cc"], > copts...

Thanks. Yes, exception support seems to work now in V8 as of I think version v9.5 (the latest envoy is using v10.4) and in emscripten as of 3.1.16. I've tried...