jkorosi

I am afraid that the proposed solution does not really help because the intention was to define a new phenomenon. The proposal still needs to pick one from the allowed...

Not just IWXXM namespace but I think all namespaces. Lets imaging that you receive IWXXM report and want to create a collective from it. If we include this report into...

@ilkkarinne that is what I wanted to express. Thank you. For better illustration this is how collective should look like by my opinion: ```xml ... IWXXM METAR 3.1.0 content ......

@blchoy: Yes, you are right. It is mentioned in the section [Content of COLLECT documents](https://wiswiki.wmo.int/tiki-index.php?page=IWXXM-3.0&structure=WIS+up). I have it in my mind that it is like this. I should better look...

I think that the limit on the number of extensions should be related only to code lists and enumeration types, but not to the already presented extensions. @mgoberfield: I believe...

Will it be a recommendation for producers of IWXXM data? Or do you mean the Schematron file which is under our control?

While implementing the current SWX Advisory, we realised that the schema allows users to construct the same regions in several ways. I am sorry that I didn't realise it sooner....

I also removed MOD_OR_SEV (see the proposal above) because it seems that this option is not mentioned in the amendment.

Hi Paddy, The structure of TC SIGMET was changed from AMD 79, as indicated by the small note under Table A6-1A. You can find the related discussion at https://github.com/wmo-im/iwxxm/discussions/267. [image:...