Jody Klymak

I'm not sure such a feature is really wanted, but even if it is, you appear to have removed subplot_mosaic which obviously has to stay.

I'll move this to draft as its not ready for review.

OK, if you do `data={"x":[1,2,3,2,4], "y":[2,1,2,3,1], "z":[5, 4, 3, 2, 1]}` this works, right? We don't have categorical data for the z axis.

Yes, right now categorical axes work by converting the string "units" to numbers. But we don't have the equivalent unit conversion machinery in place for z-data. I think one of...

I haven't tried yet, but it would be good to figure out what is currently not supported. I'd think og1.0 is 95% supported already just someone needs to make a...

Is there a reason to not just modify the yaml to have the OG1.0 compatible names and metadata? It should work fine. OG1.0 also has quality flags, which we do...

If you are willing it might be nice to share that utility via pyglider. I think the todos here are 1) make a fully OG1.0 compliant yaml file example(s) to...

Just out of curiosity, are any glider DACs ingesting OG1.0 yet?

This does seem to be a bug in that the yscale is shared in the second case, but not in the first.

> Not sure to mention it, but IMHO the implementation as child Axes is a workaround implementation detail. A possibly cleaner, more general approach would be to support multiple axises...