Juha Kiviluoma

@soininen This is done? Close?

It would be possible to execute tools in parallel that do not use files (provided that reading the same script file by two or more processes is not an issue)....

The new data structure will allow this, but this part has not yet been implemented. So, it's in the plan, which is not written out clearly anywhere as far as...

@amnanni Do you have the latest Spine Toolbox from the master branch? I think this issue may have been addressed at some point.

Does someone need this right now? I would push this forward a bit unless there is a current need.

Looks nice. Small improvements: - numbering above 9: prefix with zero (e.g. 08, 09, 10, 11). Same for >99 etc (008, 009, 010, ... 099, 100, 101) - Choice to...

In my particular case, I can do the transformation between DB and exporter. I will change the issue name to Importer - Data Store.

I wouldn't put a high priority to this. Quite ok functionality can be achieved by having a transformer between two data stores, which is supported.

And your solution is even nicer. Although how does it play with DAG order?

Ok, right. I thought you meant that there would be a small loop from DS to transformer and back to DS.