Jens Kristian Villadsen

@tadgh I'm fine closing this. There's no reason to add extra work for you guys if this has changed alot in 6.0.0

I gave it a shot with postgres and got another error: ``` fhir-server_1 | 2022-03-08 19:40:37.542 [main] ERROR o.h.e.j.batch.internal.BatchingBatch [BatchingBatch.java:130] HHH000315: Exception executing batch [java.sql.BatchUpdateException: Batch entry 0 insert into...

So something like the following (for PG): ```java version.addTableRawSql("20220309.1", "NPM_PACKAGE_VER") .addSql(DriverTypeEnum.POSTGRES_9_4, "alter table NPM_PACKAGE_VER ALTER COLUMN fhir_version_id TYPE varchar(20)"); version.addTableRawSql("20220309.2", "NPM_PACKAGE_VER_RES") .addSql(DriverTypeEnum.POSTGRES_9_4, "alter table NPM_PACKAGE_VER_RES ALTER COLUMN fhir_version_id TYPE varchar(20)");...

Would you like a PR to 6.0.0 or to a 5.7.X?

> Certainly HAPI's design very deliberately keeps no state in an individual instance that would be required for clustered operation (excluding Lucene, but that is a separate thing too). @jamesagnew...

@chgl have you had a chance to have a look at https://www.smilecdr.com/benchmarking-smile-cdr in terms of performance?

This is related to the https://github.com/hapifhir/hapi-fhir project - not this project.

@jamesagnew you might wan't to have a look at this

I agree - @markiantorno would you agree?

@swapnilthale13 what did you expect to happen?