Jason Kankiewicz

> Either AMClone is not implemented or it is missing from the header file. @lightsprint09, the equivalent of `AMClone()` *is* implemented as `AMdup()`; the verb "clone" isn't used in the...

> Thanks @jkankiewicz for the instructions! @jeffa5, you're welcome! Thank you for integrating the building and publishing of the C API documentation into your CI workfow! Now that people around...

@lightsprint09, is `AMdup()` the function you're looking for? If so, please close this ticket. Thanks!

> Either AMClone is not implemented or it is missing from the header file. @lightsprint09, since I've relented and renamed `AMdup()` to `AMclone()` through #410 can you please close this...

> I've made a few changes to automerge-c to accomodate a new ScalarValue::Unknown variant. Hopefully what I've done is sensible but would be great to get your eyes on it....

> That's probably the best way [to revise my changes to the C API] yeah. @alexjg, I've opened PR #415.

> One possibility would be...an explicit `this` in function signatures, i.e. changing `fun box foo()` to `fun foo(this: box)`. To quote the "Zen of Python", "Explicit is better than implicit."...

> I'm not in favor, but I'm also not super opposed. I'm mostly ¯_(ツ)_/¯. @SeanTAllen, if you have 4½ minutes to spare, [Dave Thomas](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Thomas_(programmer)) makes a compelling argument for the...

> Others mentioned that they can remember wanting something like this in Pony at various points in time. @sylvanc suggested the addition of a pipeline operator in [PR #4](https://github.com/ponylang/rfcs/pull/4#issuecomment-232617000).

> As I believe I have a solution that works, this issue can be closed. @shalomb, Being that you are the ticket's reporter you should be able to close it...