jjpe

@fafhrd91 I would like to thank you for working on Actix. Regardless of what the haters say, it is a marvelous system that I will still use to build async...

> Is the Settings parts integral to the problem? I replaced the `.apply_settings(&settings)` method call with `.bind("0.0.0.0:9000")?`. It does reach the handler (it seems a bit nondeterministic since it reaches...

I've written a small binary that just calls the function (let's call it `foo()`) responsible for what the `post(/upload)` route is supposed to do, and put that on a loop...

I've tried using master using the relevant TOML snippet below, but I'm running into dependency issues: ``` toml [dependencies] actix-multipart = { git = "https://github.com/actix/actix-web.git", branch = "master" } actix-rt...

I see. When I do that, I get this console output: ``` Compiling sbr-analysis-engine-server v0.5.4 (/home/j/dev/accept/sbr-analysis-engine-server) error[E0277]: the trait bound `MultipartError: ResponseError` is not satisfied --> src/main.rs:161:41 | 161 |...

> Add actix-web to your patch session. Unfortunately that doesn't fix the build issues. I think I know what's going wrong now. It appears I'll have to re-author the server...

I tried it out after compilation continued to fail. I've removed it since. > Nothing is depend on actix-multipart expect your project. I need the middleware because it's core to...

Interesting. A couple of observations: 1. I had to at least partially rewrite the code 2. After rebasing on the beta version of actix, the memory leak has certainly decreased...

> From your code previously pasted are you testing with actively drop the multipart instead of collecting it? No, `drop` isn't explicitly used in the server code at all, nor...

> That's a lot of code. Please try to make a minimal reproduce able one so the problem can be more clear. About 90-95% of it is merely handling the...