j-j.eth

Ah yeah that makes sense, so scrap option 1. A combined option 2 & 3 could be the safest option though. We can embed the freeze action in an exchange/transfer...

From the debt pool - we could issue it like we do with fee reclamation rebates.

As discussed with The Graph engineering members offline, the suggested solution is to track `RateUpdate` events from synthetix-rates here, and to calculate `effectiveValue` using the rate entities.

The output is an empty file. Basically to reproduce, run `npm run fork -- --network mainnet` in one shell and in another run `npm run test:prod:gas`. When you `cat test-gas-used-prod.log`...


A good point was raised on [Twitter today](https://twitter.com/StittsHappening/status/1190091855926444033?s=20) that atomic swaps - such as the [Uniswap synth exchange contract](https://github.com/Synthetixio/synthetix/issues/213 ) - would also be impacted under this proposal. For example,...

I propose closing this proposal in favor of Fee Reclamations: https://github.com/Synthetixio/SIPs/issues/57

Here's what I'm thinking inside each `publish/deployed/[environment]` instead of a single `deployment.json` **publish/deployed/mainnet/versions.json** ```json { "history": ["v2.20.0", "v2.19.6"], "versions": { "v2.20.0": { "name": "Betelgeuse", "timestamp": "....", "block": 12321, "targets": ["entire...

@jacko125 @hav-noms for input on ^^^

One advantage of the two step process is preventing any mistakes in the nomination - if the address is mistyped in a `transferOwnership` call then ownership is lost forever.