Jakob

Results 10 comments of Jakob

Same here, tried multiple times with multiple accounts...

_Accidentally closed the issue, sorrry._ I already started to work on the icons, but I am not perfectly happy with the results. Here a screenshot from Figma: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/72663107/182882236-5098c9f5-8049-4d33-bb48-5da79f7c3060.png) Unless you...

You definitely got a point there, I too think that yours look better. I found it hard to get the plane good looking because of the limited level of detail...

I drafted three variants of the icon, happy to recieve improvement suggestions :) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/72663107/183767980-30642013-0c32-426b-89b9-0782a8832a89.png)

You're totally right about density, I forgot about the 2px distance, sorry.😅 What do you think of this more "zoomed in" approach? ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/72663107/183848106-5422b401-051d-4691-960e-9dc5092100a2.png) My personal favourite would be the right...

Under what circumstances could one deviate from the rules? Because I personally think that it looks better with that extra element: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/72663107/183872339-64bf41b9-e3c8-41ee-8ff2-6909124d2909.png)

Any updates on this? :) As I said, I think that it looks slightly better with the extra element on the left, but the right version would also fullfill all...

What do you mean by scale comparison? The images I posted should both be 24x24px.

"tag" and "scaling" would also be candidates: ![image](https://github.com/lucide-icons/lucide/assets/72663107/ddfb2dd2-8369-4444-93ba-a006b83358c9) ![image](https://github.com/lucide-icons/lucide/assets/72663107/cf7cfc7b-6130-45af-8269-7fc4ad75cd3e)

I get the same warning.