Jesse Glick

w.r.t. `callAsync` > you ask for something to happen on the remote side and it takes a while to process and if it can not return within the default you...

> provide a wrapper to the callable for the caller timeout too That is essentially what I attempted to do with the `Timeout` utility in Pipeline code, but it is...

Maybe, so long as `stale-pr` is added to the corresponding issue.

Beware that `jenkinsci/bom` is currently used as a source of _minimum_ dependency versions (used during compilation and testing of downstream plugins), as well as a way of cross-testing recent changes...

Maybe fixed by https://github.com/mockito/mockito/pull/1974?

I also do not pretend to maintain this plugin. Not sure if anyone does.

Merge conflict. I doubt the exclusion is still necessary at all.

Still would benefit from tests. Probably ought to be migrated to traits in a newer `scm-api`. Requires a maintainer to do this work I think.

Seems like this could break legitimate use cases? Unclear.

Not accepting new features at this time unless obviously self-contained. (Also would need to use `@DataBoundSetter`.)