Johannes Feist

Same here. I just installed the extension because Microsoft/vscode#5183 claimed it would do this, but it only seems to work when you already have opened a folder.

I added positive powers, which was indeed straightforward (in the full_rewrite branch). Adding inverses or other operator functions (e.g., displacement or squeezing operators) would be really cool, but I don't...

FYI: I just released v1.0.0, which is based on the `full_rewrite` branch. Now a simple `]add QuantumAlgebra` is again sufficient to install the latest version.

Well, SymPy.jl is just a wrapper around the python package, so it would introduce a dependency on PyCall, I'd much prefer not to do that. Right now, everything is dealt...

Hi Alberto, this is indeed not supported for now. If you only need division by parameters (as opposed to operators), that should be possible to implement, but would still require...

Hi, this would indeed be nice to have, but quite a bit of work to implement. For now, there is an (I think) reasonable workaround, please see the discussion in...

Unfortunately, for now these kinds of things are the best you can do in some sense. In the longer term, I think what would be necessary is to interface the...

An update on this: version v1.4 of QuantumAlgebra now actually supports interoperability with Symbolics.jl and SymPy much better, although in a limited form: The scalar prefactors of each quantum expression...

Thanks! Yes, in the current interface, numbers are not promoted to QuantumAlgebra expressions (type `QuExpr`) for all functions automatically. I agree that this would be nice, and it is already...

In version 1.4, most routines should now also accept any `Number` type directly, so I'll close this issue.