John Fallows

> @GeraldLoeffler Could you please take a look at [my comment](https://github.com/asyncapi/spec/issues/618#issuecomment-974603269)? I'd like to hear from you and see how we can evolve the proposed model in order to support...

@jodastephen [moditect](https://github.com/moditect/moditect) can be configured to generate `module-info.class` into `META-INF/versions/9/module-info.class` instead, maintaining compatibility with Java8 and earlier runtimes.

@GedMarc if you add the following to `` section of `moditect-maven-plugin` version `1.0.0.Beta2`, it will place `module-info.class` into `META-INF/versions/9/module-info.class` instead. ``` 9 ```

@GedMarc thanks for the links, will help however I can. I'm intrigued by the _italics_ of "_seemed_ like a good idea". 😄 Libraries designed with a base version of Java9...

@gunnarmorling please take a look at the proposed fix in the linked PR.

Thanks for the feature request @hedhyw. It definitely makes sense for us to propagate the custom status description when present for consistency.

@hedhyw do you still need generic metadata headers to propagate or just custom status description per #988 for now?

@dependabot rebase

This is no longer blocked, see https://github.com/asyncapi/bindings/issues/234.

@hedhyw thank you for posting this, it may be related to known bug https://github.com/aklivity/zilla/issues/881 that is currently being worked on. It would also be helpful to analyze the zilla dump...