Jethro Larson
Jethro Larson
Well maybe we should define type then we can use that more accurately. On Tue, Jun 7, 2016, 3:52 AM ugwe43to874nf4 [email protected] wrote: > Well, it's hard, specially since "jQuery...
PRS are always welcome. Understandability is more important than accuracy in this document so if you can think of a good, simple wording I'm sure it'll get pulled
A good idea.
Functor is already in. This is turning into a dictionary fast but maybe that's still okay. Some of the topics kind of deserve their own pages. Especially when it comes...
functional.works-hub.com is not maintained by this repo. They copied the readme and didn't compile the markdown properly. I'm not sure who you should bug.
Pull requests are welcome :) On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 2:39 PM Michael Combs [email protected] wrote: > You should add an endo functor definition to better explain monadic binds....
Isn't the common definition of functor the same as endofunctor? What distinction are you hoping to make?
We could add a note to Functor to say that it's actually an endofunctor but has become the defacto meaning of functor.
@hemanth :shipit: ?
The work around is flaky IME so a real fix would be greatly appreciated!