Jethro Larson
Jethro Larson
Valid. We could also add higher-kinded types
Yeah. It's too bad you have to keep defining your own equality function for everything in JS. Especially since it's generally considered a bad practice to modify native prototypes.
I think the code we display should be moderately practical. It can be incomplete or have uncovered cases. But people should be able to copy it On Wed, Jul 27,...
While I agree, we'd have to either create our own `List` or some other type that implements all the relevant type classes. I have mixed feelings on whether that'd make...
Maybe defining everything in terms of static-land instead of fantasy-land would be better. https://github.com/fantasyland/static-land
I think when I wrote the original I was looking at the ["Pointed" typeclass in haskell](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/pointed-5.0.4/docs/src/Data.Pointed.html#Pointed) which doesn't have a requirement of functor so I didn't think that it was...
I think it's come up before and we did reorder some stuff by approachability as a result but accretion and complication snuck in. We're probably due for some revision. Ultimately...
@hemanth Yeah. There's obviously an appetite for something like this.
=== or == aren't correct since they both deal with reference equality. Mathematically two lists are equal if they contain the same items in the same order. However two arrays...
I think defining all meanings will be more confusing to newcomers. For academic descriptions of these concepts there are other better sources.