Severin Gehwolf
Severin Gehwolf
@steelhead31 I think since the previous package name was `temurin-23-jdk` then the `rpm -q --provides` output on the new package needs to have `temurin-23-jdk` in there (with proper versions). More...
> Thanks [@jerboaa](https://github.com/jerboaa) for JDK24, we wont be obsoleting anything, but I'll bear the above in mind for when/if we retrofit this changes into previous versions :) It depends whether...
Reproducer for the SELinux issue is (for example on RHEL 8): ``` $ sudo yum install https://packages.adoptium.net/artifactory/rpm/rhel/8/x86_64/Packages/temurin-23-jre-23.0.2.0.0.7-1.x86_64.rpm $ sudo -s # cat /etc/systemd/system/temurin-23-jre-demo.service [Unit] Description=Demo service using Temurin 23 (JRE)...
I've re-created services for test builds of `java-24-temurin-jdk` and `java-24-temurin-jre` from #1141 and tested it, which looks good to me and the issue seems solved: ``` # cat /etc/systemd/system/temurin-24-jre-demo.service [Unit]...
Similar for the JDK 24 RPM (`java-24-temurin-jdk`): ``` # cat /etc/systemd/system/temurin-24-jdk-demo.service [Unit] Description=Demo service using Temurin 24 (JDK) [Service] ExecStart=/usr/lib/jvm/java-24-temurin-jdk/bin/java -version [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target # systemctl daemon-reload && systemctl start temurin-24-jdk-demo.service...
/sponsor
Tested with for example `vertx-http` integration test on `Mandrel-24.2.1.0-Final` which failed prior this patch: ``` [INFO] --- quarkus:999-SNAPSHOT:build (default) @ quarkus-integration-test-vertx-http --- [INFO] [quarkus-build-caching-extension] Quarkus previous configuration not found [INFO]...
How should we proceed with this?
@gsmet Can we get this merged please, we are not getting any good signal in our CI for JDK 24/25 and risk not seeing issues we need to act on....
> AFAIU this is caused by [#47542](https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/47542) (which brings [jbossas/jboss-threads#215](https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-threads/pull/215)), i.e. it's not JDK 25+20 specific and should be reproducible with any Mandrel/GraalVM for JDK >= 24. Yes, agreed. Came...