Jem Davies
Jem Davies
~~Added Draft MR #2600 to resolve / gather feedback.~~
Closed Draft MR https://github.com/benthosdev/benthos/pull/2600 as the commit messages didn't contain a signed-off-by line. Opened new Draft MR https://github.com/benthosdev/benthos/pull/2607 for feedback.
The MR is a draft MR because I am making breaking changes to the way workflow is configured so rather than: ```yaml pipeline: processors: - workflow: order: [ [ A...
@AndreasBergmeier6176 - won't we still want to be able to use `request_map` & `result_map` to work on a subset of the message in that branch?
In the original workflow processor it "executes a topology of [branch processors](https://docs.redpanda.com/redpanda-connect/components/processors/branch/)". In a `branch` the `request_map` and `results_map` enable you work on a new message based on those mappings...
I think that you might find a number of tokens perhaps don't make sense - one in particular is the `unarchive` processor - I feel that it is poorly named....
@AndreasBergmeier6176 I think that you might be confused about how the original `workflow` processor worked - and how this works as well - as I haven't changed anything that pertains...
I also am thinking that it would be better - (though I am happy to be told otherwise) - we get rid of inferring the DAG from request_maps in the...
I have started to think that making this alteration to the way the config is specified - is better and that the PR should be resolved with a new workflow_v2...
Potentially one I could pick up.