Jens Elkner

Results 112 comments of Jens Elkner

Something like: ``` --- a/config/application.rb +++ b/config/application.rb @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +require 'objspace' +ObjectSpace.trace_object_allocations_start + +trap('PROF') { + io=File.open("/tmp/ruby-heap.dump", "w"); + ObjectSpace.dump_all(output: io); + io.close +} + require File.expand_path('../boot', __FILE__)...

Hmm - see http://iws.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~elkner/ontohub/puma-heapdump_1_hets...FMA.ttl.gif

a) Oh - but there is a `.ruby-version-deployment`, which still points to 2.1.7 and therefore the one in .ruby-version is overruled ...! b) So hopefully they'll provide fixes/updates for 2.2.x...

a) nope - if so, this info is still on its way. BTW: If it is not needed anymore, why is it still kept in the repo? A git pull...

a) NP - were prepared for it since the very 1st day ;-) b) Ah ok, so rails 4 is actually the problem. Thanx for clarification!

https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/accuracy.pdf - interesting as well ...

Well, just google for a ksh.spec file, download and copy it to e.g. /tmp/. Remove all `BuildRequires:` directives, and if you already have a ksh, set this to use, e.g....

@McDutchie We are all very busy and founding an org which does not operate in a try and error manner/chaotic way takes some time. IMHO it is better to wait...

@saper As `git log` says: @lkoutsofios patches

@McDutchie in add. to @jghub comments: Yes, we all need time slots to do some work, and for ksh usually one needs bigger ones. So everybody is in the same...