Richard Hallows

When we created our stylistic rules, we added options for completeness and consistency. Many options were never used, taking effort away from other endeavours and adding code to our base....

> Akin to what's been done for https://github.com/stylelint/stylelint/issues/7524, selector-pseudo-*-disallowed-list rules don't have to wait for the next major to be on par with their selector-pseudo-*-allowed-list counterparts. Shall we scope this...

@otomad Thanks for the report and for using the template. > Update syntax in CSSTree. Yes, that's correct. This will be fixed when the syntax is updated in our upstream...

Thanks for the report. As with https://github.com/stylelint/stylelint/issues/8609#issuecomment-2958582449, I'll mark as upstream.

> we will either have to revise [processors](https://stylelint.io/user-guide/configure#processors) current status to be non-experimental or add a new code for it. Shall we mark it as non-experimental, since it has been...

The breakdown of PRs SGTM.

@bschlenk Thanks for the request and for using the template. It does sound like a good candidate for a rule, and similar to our existing [`no-invalid`](https://stylelint.io/user-guide/rules#invalid) and [`no-unmatchable`](https://stylelint.io/user-guide/rules#unmatchable) one. It's...

@ajbeaven Thanks for the clear report and for using the template. I've labelled the issue as ready to implement. Please consider [contributing](https://stylelint.io/contributing) if you have time. The `declaration-block-no-redundant-longhand-properties` rule [looks...

Rule details: - Name: `nesting-selector-no-missing-scoping-root` - Description: Disallow missing scoping root for nesting selectors. - Message: Unexpected missing scoping root - Primary option: `true` - Secondary options: None - Category:...

That would be fantastic, thank you!