Richard Hallows

@rviscomi Thank you for chiming in and offering to contribute. If you have time, would you mind looking over @ryo-manba's [plugin](https://github.com/ryo-manba/stylelint-plugin-require-baseline), which is based on your ESLint rule, to see...

@rviscomi Thanks for the update, and for coordinating with @ryo-manba to add new features to the plugin. > let me know if there's anything I can do to help build...

A quick follow-up to this... if we do decide to keep it as a plugin, we can mention it in the [user guide](https://stylelint.io/user-guide/customize#custom-rules) for better visibility. ```diff md - Custom...

@tim-janik Thanks for the request and for using the template. I'm surprised this request hasn't come up before, as it seems like people would encounter it more often. Stylesheets are...

As there are no objections, I'll label this up. - Name: `no-invalid-position-declaration` - Description: Disallow invalid position declarations. - Message: `rejected: 'Unexpected invalid position declaration'` - Primary option: true -...

Yes, it's ultimately for style rules, but it gets tricky with nesting. For example, this should be allowed: ```css a { @layer { color: red; } } ``` So, I...

Good point. I had initially thought to call it `declaration-list-nesting-at-rule-required-list` where _declaration list_ is the thing being targeted, but didn't like the two `list`s. However, it's the more accurate name...

Block SGTM - we've used it in 5 previous rules, e.g. [duplicates](https://stylelint.io/user-guide/rules#duplicate). I've labelled the issue ready to implement. If anyone has time, please consider [contributing](https://stylelint.io/contributing). There are [steps on...

@sw1tch3roo That'd be fab. As with https://github.com/stylelint/stylelint/pull/8674, let's start with a small range of tests that we can build on during the review process. For example, given: ``` { "rules":...

We've typically only added options when users have requested them rather than for consistency. Does https://github.com/stylelint/stylelint/issues/7542 cover the vendor prefixes? If not, shall we narrow this rule to what's missing...