Jed Brown

Yes, I'd be interested in a way to support a range of cloud storage without git-fat needing to support each custom interface. See also #86.

I'm afraid I don't have time to reproduce right now (end of the semester and conference), but this sounds like an artifact of the way Git handles smudge/clean filters. I...

Probably git fat checkout then. I'm not aware of anything git-fat could do to fix this before git status gives you confusing output. Git decides when to run the filters...

Thanks for debugging this. Would you be willing to add a zero-length file to the test script so that this case gets tested and submit that, along with your patch...

This is a filesystem issue, not a git-fat issue. (From a security perspective, it doesn't matter whether git-fat has an interface, it matters whether the underlying protocol and permissions system...

This is a separate issue and the reason I want git-fat to have named remotes. We have discussed it a few times.

I can't promise a date, but see PR #28 for recent discussion.

I'm reluctant to create this interface. I'd rather create a git config section or a `.git/info/fat` for this sort of local modification. Would that serve your purpose?

You can use gitattributes on a per-directory basis, for example. But we're intrinsically dependent on the gitattributes system to decide when to apply filters. Maybe you're suggesting that git-fat have...

git-fat just applies clean and smudge filters without knowledge of the filename. gitattributes determines which filters to run, if any. Please open a bug report with a script to reproduce...