Jeremy Danyow

Results 114 comments of Jeremy Danyow

Appreciate all the hard work you’re doing!

@niieani I started working on this. aurelia-async needed quite a bit of refactoring to bring it up to date with the latest version of aurelia-binding. I'm currently working on the...

We're still debating the best way to handle async binding. Recently a feature was added to aurelia called view engine hooks that make it very easy to implement "binding functions"....

@jods4 - thanks for your feedback. I'm not 100% in love with the syntax either. I'll try to respond to some of your comments inline below: --- > This is...

All, I'd like to move forward on improving the syntax. So far we know one thing: no-one, including me, likes the `..` syntax. **The requirements are:** 1. ability to bind...

I like the double colon too, unfortunately ES7's function-bind feature is using that operator. I don't think binding behaviors are going to help us here- it's too ambiguous- it would...

@niieani if you're moving forward with [this approach](https://github.com/jdanyow/aurelia-async/issues/3#issuecomment-182829563) I think the most performant way to go about it would be to change these lines in the parser (via monkey patching...

yep- the plan is to create a breeze implementation of the Validator interface in aurelia-validatejs. I haven't done it yet because we're still working through API changes in aurelia-validation (still...

The 0.97 release of Dogfalo/materialize has a malformed package.json: https://github.com/jspm/registry/issues/224#issuecomment-117691359

Just pushed a commit with the latest aurelia build as well as a change to the jspm config in the package.json to ensure v 0.96.1 of Dogfalo/materialize is used.