Jc

The following JSONB example includes: - Full example model class - How to specify the correct coder, including the current `require` workaround needed - How to generate the migration -...

Workaround - add a presence validation to your model for at least one of the fields with a default value, e.g. `validates :bool, presence: true`, this way the `create!` call...

@jkowens Yes, it would appear so - making that another viable workaround, probably even the preferred one actually - thanks for pointing that out! As far as options, a pattern...

@paveltiunov interesting, I'll take a look

Another option would be to call `client.quit()` here, but I'm not sure that's the right answer either. Calling `client.end(true)` will clear the buffers, and if there is a command found...

@ifokeev Thanks that helps! Looking around at what some other libraries do: This one (`sol-redis-pool`) does `client.end(true)` but wraps it in a try/catch: https://github.com/joshuah/sol-redis-pool/blob/291b1a39a8f93982b99d8b55feb5d9edf06fb20f/index.js#L86-L93 This one (`node-redis-connection-pool`) does `client.quit()`: https://github.com/silverbucket/node-redis-connection-pool/blob/59715ae927289e73ad778ddc0e87a1f01901d33a/src/redis-connection-pool.js#L111-L115...

Good point @supairish - looks like we're a bit behind on the changelog file, but we've been putting the details in the release artifact, the 3.0 release notes are here:...

thanks for raising the issue - afaik, multi-language support has not been investigated for this gem, so I'm unable to offer you any other ideas

> @jcw- Do I get right that [jest-a-coverage-slip-detector](https://github.com/GetJobber/jest-a-coverage-slip-detector) is the solution to this problem? Yes - or at least, the same strategy is. You have to collect the coverage from...

> Aside from [jest-a-coverage-slip-detector](https://github.com/GetJobber/jest-a-coverage-slip-detector) > > What is the alternative or the official recommendation/guide to merge coverage files when using shard option? I struggled finding an authoritative answer (but would...