Jude Nelson
Merged!
> If we wanted to be consistent with the overflow/underflow runtime errors that we took for the math operators, we would throw a runtime error, no? I strongly believe that...
> If this is something we don't want to include in this SIP...could it open the door to some unintended consequences (like the ones @lgalabru mentioned)? Wrapping the shift operand...
I see the symbols have changed. Is that the feedback from the technical CAB?
> The situation was that it was a last minute contribution from a community member and it seems like a non-controversial add on, and therefore not worth the effort of...
@whoabuddy @obycode Has this been signed off on by both your CABs?
Just an update on this -- we will merge this once 2.1 activates on mainnet.
I took another pass at this, in light of the recent OpenSea phishing attack. While I stand by my belief that discussion of `to-consensus-buff` should be part of the Stacks...
Did another pass. Let's go ahead and advance this to Accepted :tada: Before we can advance to Recommended, I have two outstanding comments that need to be addressed. Also, @kantai...
Cool! Do the authors feel that this is ready for activation?