JC Brand
JC Brand
Great bug report, thanks.
Thanks for your bug reports. I think #3804 and #3805 are basically different manifestations of this same issue. I've seen it before as well and basically what happens is that...
> Converse.js version 10.1.8 (which we prefer in terms of UI) and 11.0.1 (which users voted against of) What difference in UI are you referring to here?
Here is the error occurring in a loop: ``` SASL authentication succeeded. converse-headless.esm.js:32601 Connection.prototype.bind called but "do_bind" is false converse-headless.esm.js:32598 WebSocket stream error: not-well-formed ```
If you stay on v10, you're going to miss out on any bugfixes and improvements made in the future, unless you make the effort yourself to port those fixes and...
Ok, I did read that, which is why I wrote _"as I understand, you don't use it currently"_. I figured if you're making the effort to write bug reports that...
> This may be the case, but you lash out at users who report issues, as if they (issues) insult your ego. I don't "lash out" at people who are...
Didn't you state earlier that you exited the pilot? > You misunderstood me. I several times commented that we had pulled out of the ConverseJS pilot, having found too many...
The code you're referring to was added here: https://github.com/conversejs/converse.js/commit/b7b14601773e63ede3f93c47550fdc317553a04a I don't remember the context of that change anymore, but the tests added in the commit give a clue. Perhaps the...
I think this ticket can now be closed, right?