Jeff Bradberry
Jeff Bradberry
@AlekseiSaff can you clarify? Do you mean to include the execution node, or the hosts that are being automated against?
@AlanCoding I don't know about this, any solution starting with the word 'backdate' seems iffy to me.
@rmauc @jvandermeulen https://github.com/ansible/awx/pull/8328#issuecomment-707171773 as noted above.
@AlanCoding having just tracked down the original PR that put that there, which indicates that `is_successful` may have different implementations, I am amending my opinion. Something like this seems called...
Yeah, no, I just realized that my suggestion isn't workable either. This is tricky, and I don't think anymore that getting rid of the inner block is the way to...
@AlanCoding I'm afraid I'm not a fan of relying on special naming of objects to get different behavior. My off-the-cuff proposal would be to add a boolean field to `InstanceGroup`...
@AlanCoding I don't see how adding the new role described in that RFE helps with either of the problems enumerated in this issue, though I do like having finer-grained roles...
> If an instance group has restrictions, such as managing separate external environments, you wouldn't want other instance groups inheriting the jobs as fallback which could cause unnecessary job failures....
> Right now, people associate instance groups to their organization in order to allow organization admins to access them. If instance groups had an admin_role, then they would just delegate...
@JoelKle thanks for all of this context, this seems useful.